$ git diff main -- thread/claude-code-review-launch-mar-2026.md
Anthropic launched Claude Code Review on 18 Mar 2026 as a managed GitHub PR-comment surface on top of Claude Code CLI. It is not priced as its own product: Claude Code is included in any Claude plan seat, so the cost is the seat. Anthropic publishes Team at $20/seat/mo annual for a standard seat and $100/seat/mo annual for a premium seat with 5x the usagesrc. A 10-dev team on premium seats spends $1,000 a month; on standard seats, $200. Only Enterprise, at $20/seat/mo annual, explicitly adds usage at API rates on top, which at 50 PRs/week and 250 LOC/PR is about $54 a month in Sonnet 4.6 tokens.
1+A managed PR-comment surface that sits on top of Claude Code CLI. GitHub Checks + PR comments + reasoning trace.
2+Token meter passes through to the standard Anthropic API. Sonnet 4.6 list: $3/M input, $15/M outputsrc.
3-GitHub-only at launch. GitLab and Bitbucket not yet announced. Azure DevOps unclear.
1
seat = $100 * 10 = $1,000/mo2
PRs/mo = 50 * 4.33 = 216.53
tokens/PR = 250 * 24 input + 250 * 2 output4
token $/PR = (6000/1M)*$3 + (500/1M)*$15 = $0.018 + $0.0075 = $0.02555
token total = $0.0255 * 216.5 = $5.52/mo6+all-in: ~$1,006/mo at 10 devs
1Claude Code Review IS the managed-BYOK hybrid. The seat just buys the surface; tokens go to Anthropic directly. So "BYOK vs Claude Code Review" is really "DIY surface vs Anthropic's surface" on the same token bill.
2For CodeRabbit, Greptile and Qodo the breakeven is unchanged because they bundle tokens. See /byok-breakeven.
1/tool/claude-code-review - full file
2/vs/greptile-vs-claude-code-review - the head-to-head
3/byok-breakeven - downstream math